My latest obsession involves balancing and slowly moving along a long strip of nylon webbing, somewhere around one to two inches wide, strung between two anchor points. The goal is simple: walk end to end. The execution of that goal can be frustrating, but it's insanely fun. With the right people, the frustration goes away. This is the wonderful sport of slackline.
I started slacklining by accident. What started as an attempt to take photos for a class assignment turned into being coerced onto the beginner's line. My friend Kevin was nice enough to force me to try it. "You can't come to a Platty Slack meeting and not try it," he insisted. Given my awkward nature and tendency to embarrass easily, I was nervous learning something new in front of people I'd just met, but I didn't fight Kevin on his request. My curiosity and desire to learn beat out any part of me trying to avoid inevitable embarrassment. Plus, it looks so darn fun. As per usual, my mind jumped to the worst case scenario: that everybody was watching and waiting to laugh at my feeble attempts to slackline. And, as usual, I was wrong. The members of Platty Slack welcomed me with open arms, words of encouragement and high-fives. So many high-fives. It's intoxicating to be in an environment with almost excessive positivity. Each time I failed, Kevin was there to tell me what I did right and what to do better next time. He's just happy to share his passion with others.
Much like at a Ben & Jerry's, everyone oozes happiness at slackline. Even when I grew frustrated with the 1-inch flowline (see image to the left) I couldn't help but smile. That's the best part of slackline, the fun. Club president Steve Larson will congratulate you after finally walking the line, but as long as you're having a good time, he's pleased. Actually, any member of slackline does the same. Slackers have a passion for what they do, but more than that they love to share it. Slackline is severely underrated; even more underrated are those who practice it. I constantly state that the track team is where I belong. My teammates are on my level of weird, yet one or two people manage to rub me the wrong way. With Platty Slack, I've never felt more accepted by a group of people. It's hard to put into words why. This feeling inspires me to avoid those who bring me down. Why waste my time on individuals who are content with tearing me down? The past few months I've been consistently happy, and I attribute that to the people I surround myself with. I cut out the negativity and focused on who and what makes me happy. Platty Slack plays a key role in that and I couldn't be happier.
I have been lucky enough to attend a handful of NHL games at three different rinks. Thanks to generous family members and vacations, I've witnessed three playoff games as the Coyotes of Arizona hosted the Detroit Red Wings, one regular season matchup of the Minnesota Wild at San Jose, and one game in the heart of hockey country as the Canadiens beat my beloved Pittsburgh Penguins. I discovered the best overall experience is found in the cities that don't bleed hockey. The tickets are cheaper, the outdoor climate is more pleasant, and the fans are more creative than rude.
The Bell Centre
Home of the first member of the Original Six, the Bell Centre opens its doors to hockey-crazed fans from late September for preseason action until Montreal's playoff run ends, usually early May. (Sorry, fans.) The building shakes with the cheers and jeers of Canadiens fans. The nose bleed seats, from which you'll probably need binoculars to see, run from $27-$52. It's not a bad deal if you're into the atmosphere more than the game, or don't mind watching specks fight over an even smaller speck. For those fans who wish to see the action more clearly, it'll cost anywhere from $196 to $275. These prices, found on the Bell Centre website, reflect the real cost. Using a middle man like Stub Hub leads to tickets with inflated prices. Would you like to sit on the glass behind the net? You better be willing to drop $425 because prime seating in Montreal is hella expensive. Aside from the typically outrageous ticket prices, Canadiens games present an electrifying, yet often hostile, environment in which to play. Fans whoop and shout loud enough to be heard across the border. Ok, so that might be an exaggeration, but it isn't much of a stretch as Canadiens fans are known to be obnoxious. Living and breathing Montreal hockey can make people crazy; it's not unusual for fans to boo their own team for playing anything less than perfect. On the other hand, if the Habs are on top of their game, fans easily make the atmosphere hostile for the opposing team. Chants of "Fleur-y!" rained down that one time I stepped foot in Habs territory. You can even hear the taunts during live broadcasts. Attending a Montreal game is exhilarating, with the crazed fans screaming for sixty minutes straight and extraordinary pregame light show, but the outrageous ticket prices and hostility outweigh the pros. I'd rather spend my money on a plane ticket to the west coast.
Gila River Arena (formerly Jobing.com Arena)
One might wonder how hockey in the desert has lasted nearly twenty years. Wonder no more! (Lame, sorry). If you live in a hot, dry climate, ice is somewhat of a novelty, and I believe that's reason number one why the Coyotes stuck around this long. Local Phoenicians must've been in awe. "Ooh, what is this sheet of white with colored lines? Oh! It's cold! And what is that black rubber disc? Fascinating!" Of course this is a massive dramatization. Residents of Glendale obviously don't live under rocks, and they probably know of hockey. Bringing hockey to Arizona has been vital to growing the sport in the States and desert. It starts with young kids watching and idolizing the professionals playing in their backyard, then those kids learn how to play. The whole process picks up speed when the original young players inspire the next group, and so on. Keeping the Coyotes in the desert led to this snowball effect. USA Hockey data lists Arizona as first in hockey growth among states with an NHL team and third among all states after last season. The desert loves hockey. Desert hockey fans aren't crazy from cold winters; most think 60 is freezing. The focus lies on the game and having a good time. Other than every seat being the best seat in the rink, the howl of the goal horn is the greatest aspect of Coyotes games.
It kind of makes you want to chime in, doesn't it? Plus it gets the fans all hype for the game. 'Yotes fans howl with pride for their dudes and with anticipation for the action to come. Not to mention it's difficult to create a hostile environment for visiting players when the fans are just happy to escape the heat for a few hours. Imagine strolling around in the sun for a few hours, grabbing some food from Jimmy Buffet's Margaritaville, maybe do a little shopping, and then amble on over to the arena to cool off by watching grown men on 0.115 inch thick blades bat at a rubber biscuit for two hours. Did I mention it's on the rocks? Enjoy!
SAP Center at San Jose
Welcome to the jung–wait, that's not it. Oh, that's right. This is the SHARK TANK! Also, WELCOME! (Caps lock on for emphasis because it's fun and I support the men in teal.) Not only is this a sweet silhouette photo op, the players literally enter the ice from the mouth of a foggy, red-eyed shark. It does not get any cooler than that. And you can try to find something to beat it, but one of two things will happen: you'll either die from fatal levels of awesome, or, the more likely outcome, you won't find jack. Unless you were looking for Jack. You might find him. He sounds cool, but not as cool as skating out of a demonic shark head. When they dim those lights, you best get to your feet; the Sharks are about to surface and feast on the unfortunate opponent. Chomp chomp go the Sharks. And so do the fans. No, seriously.
When San Jose is awarded a power play, nearly every single fan in the arena extends both arms forward, one claw hand on top of the other, palms facing each other, and moves the top hand to create a shark mouth ready to nosh on the competition. The Shark Chomp, accompanied with Jaws music, kicks so much ass. The music itself is cool, but throw in an arena full of chomping fans and it's unreal. Quite possibly the best display of fandom is the chomp. (I'm pretty sure this footage is super old, but the modern chomp looks exactly like this, just in high-definition.) Fan bases have their own unique in-game rituals. Sharks fans just happen to practice the premier, supreme, unsurpassed, unparalleled, ultimate, incomparable tradition. Shoutout to the thesaurus for all those synonyms of "best". One awkward adjective wasn't enough to describe the Shark Chomp.
Before I dive into my obsession over the new Penguins third jerseys, let me provide a small disclaimer. I support several NHL teams, including the Chicago Blackhawks, San Jose Sharks and New York Islanders. It's impossible for me to commit to one team like the "die hard" fans, who are obnoxious and often disrespectful to the sport and the players. And now I'm going off on a brief rant, so bear with me. All sports fans have the right to hate teams and players, but I'm bothered when they show blatant disrespect. If you hate a player, like Sidney Crosby, you should recognize his talent as well. Too often Crosby is referred to as a "pussy"(pardon my French) or other derogatory names. I would love to see fans jump into Crosby's skates and experience the game from his perspective. Fans, be obnoxious and crazy, just please show some respect for the elite hockey athletes who worked hard to get where they are today.
Now let's get back to our regularly scheduled blog post.
I'm currently pinching every penny I have so I can buy a gold Evgeni Malkin jersey.
Pittsburgh unveiled new third jerseys in September, which are a throwback their threads of the mid-1980's and early 1990's. The Penguins are my day one team, the first team I liked when I started to follow professional hockey, and these jerseys have rekindled my love. The yellow gold looks sharper than the bland, brown gold on the typical home and away jerseys.
The unveiling video is epic, though it could be better. I understand Crosby is the face of the Pittsburgh Penguins, but he lacks the intimidation factor. Quite frankly I'm more inclined to pinch his cheeks. Crosby will always be a cute little hockey player from Halifax, Nova Scotia, with naught a menacing bone in his body.
The Pittsburgh gold jerseys make their debut October 22 as the Penguins host their rivals from Philadelphia. The throwback sweaters will make an appearance 11 other times this season, but I say increase that number! Show off those gold threads. Make the hockey world remember a time when Pittsburgh dominated the ice, winning the 1991 and 1992 Stanley Cup. Make the sports world remember the "City of Champions" version of Pittsburgh, minus the Penguins, when the Steelers and Pirates won their respective championships. Pittsburgh gold pleases the eye more so than brown gold. Yuck.
One option the Penguins should consider is doing away with the brown gold jerseys and making gold the norm. Gold catches the eye; it's dazzling. Plus the blue jerseys make for great alternates when being so stylish grows old.
These beauties are a classic. Hockey jerseys remain the coolest of all sports uniforms, especially when there are laces at the neckline. It elicits memories of old-time hockey and playing on frozen ponds or lakes. Laces on jerseys create nostalgia. I think laces should be on every alternate jersey because it's a reminder of the sport's humble beginnings.
If the Penguins continue down the throwback path, it's not long before we'll return to the dark blue of the 1970's Penguins, before the struggling team switched to gold. And I cannot wait for that day.
How dope would Evgeni Malkin look in this bad boy? The answer is pretty dope. The logo hasn't changed much, but the colors sure have. Current away and home jerseys are nearly identical, save for coloring. I vote Pittsburgh throw it back even further to the dark blue in the very near future, like within the next five to seven years. Give me enough time to save money for yet another jersey for my collection, please. Several current NHL teams sport blue on their jerseys but nothing quite like what I'm now calling Pittsburgh blue.
Of course if the Pittsburgh blue is cursed, i.e. we revert to our losing ways of the '70s, maybe we should stick to variations of gold. I mean, we did win three Stanley Cups decked out in black and gold. It's probably best to save the blue for special occasions as alternate jerseys. Plus, blue doesn't fit well into the mantra "black and gold 'till I'm dead and cold."
Of all the Sports Illustrated issues my dad has given me, I've never seen a college hockey cover. I'm not even sure SI writes college hockey articles, yet the magazine decided on three college basketball stories for its March 17 week issue. The only positive comments I can muster about this issue include the clever recreation of Larry Bird's cover and feature on a star player I'd never heard of.
This throwback cover is cleverly remade with Doug McDermott, a dude who made himself known when he started breaking records and passing legends on the list of all-time scorers. It's especially nice to see the more quiet stars get their time in the spotlight. Obviously McDermott is a huge part of his team, but I've heard more about Jabari Parker, Shabazz Napier, Andrew Wiggins, Julius Randle, Rodney Hood and Tyler Ennis. I guess that's why he's dubbed a secret weapon.
I searched "Doug McDermott" on YouTube for fun, and I found a video made by Fox Sports. It features McDermott discussing how he mastered the art of scoring, which is patience. The other videos from my search results include those by CBS Sports, the NBA, Pardon the Interruption on ESPN, Creighton Athletics, the Big East Conference and Dan Patrick. Cool, he's getting recognized. My issue still lies in the lack of college hockey coverage across all forms of media, especially magazines.
Johnny Gaudreau of Boston College was the face of college hockey. I couldn't tell you any other star players because I haven't heard any. I searched YouTube for Johnny Gaudreau videos and found they were made from random accounts, not companies like ESPN or CBS. McDermott hasn't been drafted yet, but Gaudreau scored a goal in his first NHL game. His Boston College Eagles were knocked out in the semifinal game by the eventual NCAA champions, Union College. Not many players go straight from a college hockey national semifinal game to playing in their first NHL game, and even fewer score their first goal in that first game. Why didn't this get more coverage? I'm simply assuming there was a lack of coverage based on past experience and the fact that SI doesn't have a NCAA hockey tab on its website. So, I can only guess that Sportscenter mentioned it in passing before moving on to something about basketball while SI skipped over it. As I'm still behind on my stack of SI, I can only speculate the actual coverage. Hockey fans are lucky SI featured Marty St.Louis within this NCAA basketball issue.
Luckily for hockey fans, John Buccigross of Sportscenter brings as much hockey to the table as possible, even if magazines don't do the same. Buccigross covered the Frozen Four, a tournament that saw record viewership, with Barry Melrose this year. If college basketball and football receive the royal treatment in terms of coverage, there should be more emphasis on college puck across the board as well.
How is that not exciting? A team wins its first NCAA championship with authority. I think sports fans as a whole don't understand hockey well enough to convince magazines to expand coverage. Then again, watching college sports itself should warrant extensive coverage. College athletes play with pride and heart for themselves and their team because they only get four years. Pro athletes, on the other hand, get paid either way for the duration of their contracts, which usually last several years.
College sports can be just as exciting or even more exciting than professionals. It makes sense to cover college hoops and football, but what about hockey? That's all I want to know. Don't leave these gritty kids out.
Chris Jones and I would be great friends. I've come to this conclusion after hearing him speak for only an hour. The foundation of our fictional friendship is a shared appreciation of fries smothered in cheese and gravy, better known as Canada's greatest gift to the world, besides hockey. My favorite quote is not at all related to magazines, but food. "Poutine is like a warm bed inside of your body," Jones said. I nearly stood and clapped for this gem. I mean, he's not wrong. Poutine tastes like a hug, or a warm bed, feels.
Oh, goodness I'm drooling all over my laptop. The key to my heart is clearly cheese curds and gravy. Hey, Chris, let's be best friends and gorge ourselves on poutine.
You'll find sense of humor below poutine on my list of reasons to be best friends with Chris Jones. After making several jokes, Chris added that he makes jokes because he's uncomfortable and to hide his pain. This is also a joke, but I can relate. I'm awkward. Having serious conversations makes me uncomfortable, so I use humor to deflect the tension. Actually, most situations cause me to feel awkward and uncomfortable, leading to me never closing my mouth. Strings of meaningless words spew out, often some poor jokes, when I revert to humor. If I don't know how to respond, my instinct is to make a joke, hoping it'll change the subject. It's probably unhealthy, but they do say laughter is the best medicine.
Somewhere in the middle, Chris Jones planted the seeds for my anxiety attack. I sat in my car afterwards, taking note of everything running through my mind. It occurred to me I have no idea what I'm doing with my life. Sure, I've chosen a focused major and already have an idea of a future career, but the little confidence I had in that plan disappeared. Way to go, Mr. Jones. It's actually not entirely his fault. Chris Jones made some good points about what it takes to be a journalist. I'm the one over thinking it. Less than half of what he said caused me to freak out.
Lack of self confidence is by far my biggest issue. Jones stated that if you don't care or have the drive to succeed, switch careers. I know on some level I care and feel motivated, but is it enough? I have doubts about my abilities. I don't think I'll be competitive when looking for a job. I'm probably not good enough. Motivation is not my strong suit. I care, but to what extent? All these negative thoughts spin around and around in my head. Feeling drained of all energy and optimism, I rested my head on my steering wheel. Maybe I should switch majors. Again. There's no way I'm going back to science and nothing else seems to interest me. Journalism is the only way I'll have a chance at my dream job, analyzing hockey for Sportscenter or working for any NHL team. For now I plan on sticking with my current plan and maybe the motivation I lack will find me one day as I chase down my dream.
I hope my other skills will carry me through to the end. Chris pointed out that as a journalist, you must look around and have questions. How else can you report if you don't ask questions? Luckily for me, I'm constantly wondering about the world and the things in it. I've briefly researched multiple athletes and sports teams on several occasions, curious about their history. On top of that, I try to be the best listener. Not enough people stop to listen to what others have to say. Often people just need to get things off their chest and hearing them out is the best moral support. I know how frustrating it is to be interrupted or ignored when all I need is to share what I'm thinking. The least I can do is lend an ear when others won't. Listening helps build relationships and improve my own listening skills. Both will be useful in the long run. In a noisy world, the few quiet ones listening will prevail, which is why I take Chris' words on listening to heart. I may not be the most competitive in my skill set, but I can ensure I listen better than anybody else.
I enjoy magazines very much, but I don't have any subscriptions. I have yet to find a magazine that provides a happy medium between fashion and beauty, and sports or other "unladylike" topics. As an almost 20-year-old, fashion and beauty magazines want me as a reader, or at least I think I'm part of their target age range, but that's not my style, pun intended. I couldn't be further from the typical fashion magazine reader, as my daily struggle is choosing a t-shirt, not coordinating a nice outfit. There could be titles I don't know about that cover a broad range of topics to fulfill my magazine needs.
Magazine genres force readers in to gender roles. As a female, I feel like I'm overstepping some sort of line by reading Sports Illustrated, though I usually only read the issues with hockey articles. General sports magazines have a masculine feel as well. I'm not saying they should girl it up, but it's possible to soften the design, make the overall magazine more neutral. Sport specific magazines appear welcoming to me. Maybe these titles have a lesser range of readers to please, so no person is left desiring more, or maybe it's easier to please everybody because you can do so much when the focus is one sport, not several.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, we have magazines for women, clearly the work of Satan. And what topics could these girly magazines focus on? Fashion and beauty. Duh. I mean, women are clearly the only people in this world who know how to dress well and give the impression of absolute beauty, right? I guess I was born without this knowledge. I know the basics of putting together an outfit and how to use makeup. Did I miss a class for that other stuff? No, I didn't miss anything. Magazines just pigeonhole their readers. You either learn it and perfect it, or you live knowing you failed as a girl. Thanks, media!!!!
It's actually starting to offend me how fashion magazines insist women be well-dressed and seemingly perfect all the time. God forbid I violate any fashion rules. I know when I look ridiculous, but I don't need a (probably) materialistic, self-described fashionista telling me what to wear. Show me realistic outfits, makeup tutorials, or other easy how-to's. Oh, if the products used could be affordable, that'd be swell. I'm not spending copious amounts of cash to look like Emma Watson or Jennifer Lawrence, especially when it is in fact impossible to recreate their incomparable good looks.
You can't recreate this flawlessness. Both Watson and Lawrence have a team of stylists. Hair, makeup, and clothes are done by professionals, probably taking several hours. On top of the professional beauty team, the magazines definitely retouch and edit the photos. We know both women are tremendously beautiful, so why bother retouching? Such beauty is unattainable as it is, yet apparently it's okay to raise the bar even higher. I can hear all dreams of being this beautiful shatter in to tiny, tiny pieces of sadness.
Am I bitter? Probably. In my defense, this kind of bologna starts crushing dreams at an early age. Not only do teen magazines destroy confidence and self-esteem, but also foster short attention spans and create unrealistic conceptions of beauty that continue to adulthood. Celebrities on the cover of teen magazines are posed to appear nonthreatening, and give the sense that celebs are "just like you and me!". "OMG so-and-so is totally a normal person like me and not getting paid oodles of cash for coming off that way. Like, we're so similar, but I also want to be more like him/her. Clearly he/she is definitely the nicest, greatest person ever." Blah blah blah. I'm not saying celebrities aren't super sweet and nice like they appear to be, I'm just saying jerks exist. Yeah, I am bitter, but let's examine the covers of these magazines. It's fairly evident my observations are realistic.
Teen People come on down! You're the next contestant on "What's wrong with magazines?"! Here are my initial thoughts upon viewing this horrendous cover:
Oh! Ashton Kutcher!
Wait, what is this garbage?
Ashton is clearly the cover story, but I can't stop staring at Chad & Sophia. WHAT ARE THEIR LOVE SECRETS?!
Why are there floating heads above handsome Ashton?
So many things are happening at once, I don't know where to look now.
Is it necessary to have a colorful background in addition to every sub-heading being a different bright color?
Why is drama bigger than teens changing the world? Are the readers shallow?
Oh, a quiz. "Are you stuck up?" Yeah, that sounds like it's based on science.
Fashion and beauty bargains? Now we're talking.
I can't help but think the audience for Teen People is made of young girls, maybe 12-15, and these girls care more about meaningless drama that has zero effect on their future and less about teens changing the world. Then again, all the color and crowded feel of the cover indicate a short attention span. With so much going on, it's difficult to focus on one aspect of the cover without being distracted by something else. I'm trying to stare at the lovely Ashton Kutcher, but my eyes keep going down to Chad and Sophia, and up to the floating heads. That totally ruins the moment. How can I appreciate how his hand is pushing his hair back, in a nonthreatening way of course, if I keep getting sidetracked?
Popstar! might be the biggest culprit of colorful, crowded covers. I feel as though I don't need to say anything about this one because it almost speaks for itself and correlates with my previously mentioned ideas. Color can make sub-headings pop, but the bright background kind of defeats this purpose. It's definitely not necessary to have several photos clogging the cover and confusing the readers. I don't think there is a focal point here. So, I have two questions for the cover designer(s): where am I supposed to look? and why would you repeatedly create such an atrocity? (It just occurred to me that maybe this is a strategy for Popstar! to stand out. Sad, but plausible.)
There's too much going on and I believe this sort of thing is to blame for readers having short attention spans and getting distracted easily. The best way to describe teen magazine readers is to equate them to Dug, the dog from Up!
From a young age, girls are pressured to be the ideal woman who consistently looks flawless. Magazines don't help. Your option is to go full beauty queen or full tomboy in regards to which magazine you select. I'd never stopped to think about this issue before, how limited options can pigeonhole girls, but now it irks me. Gender neutral magazines could be successful if you find where interests overlap and present it in a non discriminating fashion. I see a new niche of magazines being created for those girls somewhere in between fashionista and tomboy. I'd like to be passionate about a magazine, but I haven't quite found the one for me. Maybe it has yet to be developed, or maybe I'll start it. Either way, I wish to see titles with more blending of the two extremes, beauty queen and tomboy. Ignorance was bliss, but now I've become bitter hoping for change. Fashion magazines will probably always annoy me, though I'd have less time to rant and critique if I had a decent magazine to occupy my brain.
My dad knows I'm a huge sports buff and saves all his Sports Illustrated for me. My pile is only at ten issues right now, two of which have hockey-related articles. I looked at each table of contents and found one article on the Colorado Avalanche and one on Russia's hockey team. This infuriates me. If you can't tell already, hockey is my favorite sport to play, follow, and watch. The lack of coverage is insulting.
The Colorado Avalanche team is newsworthy with new head coach and former goalie star Patrick Roy. First overall draft pick Nathan MacKinnon adds more youth to the already youthful team, joining Gabriel Landeskog, Jamie McGinn, Paul Stastny, and Matt Duchene. Of the 26 players listed on the roster, only seven are 30 or older. The oldest two are defenseman Jan Hejda, 35, and goaltender Jean-Sebastien Giguere, 36. In hockey years, that's not old. Not yet.
On paper it makes sense to focus on Colorado:
A new head coach, who happens to be a very famous former goalie
Overall young team
The top draft pick, a skilled dude who is younger than I
How could you not write about such a team? I think they will be cup contenders, even in the tough Western Conference. Which reminds me, there should be an article spotlighting the Western Conference teams. The 14 teams in the west include the stacked teams of San Jose, Los Angeles, Chicago, St. Louis, Anaheim, and Colorado. The other teams are close behind, like Dallas, Phoenix, and Minnesota. Come playoff time, the west is going to have the more competitive series. Sure, if you look at the standings in the east, you might think it's anybody's game. Wrong. The clear leaders of the divisions are Boston and Pittsburgh, with 93 and 92 points, respectively. The closest team has 80 points. Unless Boston and Pittsburgh choke, I see them playing in the Eastern Conference Finals. The Western Conference will most likely see series going the full seven games. I can't begin to speculate which two teams make conference finals in the west. It all comes down to who can stay healthy and focused, and, most importantly, goaltending. Your forwards can score plenty of goals, but you won't make it with a shoddy goalie, or shoddy defense.
I don't understand why SI published an article on the Russian hockey team. It's an American magazine. The story behind the team might be intriguing, but I'd prefer if they could balance that out with coverage on the American team. Where's that article? The American team is full of mostly lesser known players, clearly underdogs to team Canada's roster of NHL captains. Yeah, we have Patrick Kane and James van Riemsdyk, but that does not compare to Sidney Crosby, John Tavares, Patrice Bergeron, Martin St.Louis, Dustin Brown, Jonathan Toews, Corey Perry, and Shea Weber, to name a "few." Now I've rambled. Back to Russia! I enjoy reading about one of my favorite players, Evgeni Malkin, but he wasn't even the face of the article in SI. Russia's team was dubbed to belong to Alex Ovechkin, a poor decision. He hasn't impressed much as of late. I'd choose Pavel Datsyuk, the mayor of Danglestan, as John Buccigross has said. I still want more on our team. It's an underdog story. A decent transition from analyzing Russia's team to analyzing team USA would be to use the 1980 game, arguably the most important sporting event in our history. I don't think it's that hard to do. Maybe there's a rule as to how many hockey articles can be included, or maybe this one story reached some sort of quota. Clearly I'm getting heated and more bitter as I type. I'll close with Herb Brooks and the greatest sports speech ever for two reasons: Miracle is the best sports movie of all time, and I have some hockey games of my own. I could always use a Herb Brooks pep talk.
